Method of operating a nuclear power plant

ABSTRACT

The present relates to the integration of the primary functional elements of graphite moderator and reactor vessel and/or primary heat exchangers and/or control rods into an integral molten salt nuclear reactor (IMSR). Once the design life of the IMSR is reached, for example, in the range of 3 to 10 years, it is disconnected, removed and replaced as a unit. The spent IMSR functions as the medium or long term storage of the radioactive graphite and/or heat exchangers and/or control rods and/or fuel salt contained in the vessel of the IMSR. The present also relates to a nuclear reactor that has a buffer salt surrounding the nuclear vessel. During normal operation of the nuclear reactor, the nuclear reactor operates at a temperature that is lower than the melting point of the buffer salt and the buffer salt acts as a thermal insulator. Upon loss of external cooling, the temperature of the nuclear reactor increases and melts the buffer salt, which can then transfer heat from the nuclear core to a cooled containment vessel.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No.16/037,636 filed Jul. 17, 2018, which is a divisional of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 14/451,703 filed Aug. 5, 2014, which iscontinuation-in-part of International Patent Application No.PCT/CA2013/050090 filed Feb. 6, 2013, which claims the benefit of U.S.Provisional Application No. 61/633,071 filed Feb. 6, 2012. U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 14/451,703 claims the benefit of U.S. ProvisionalApplication 61/862,378 filed on Aug. 5, 2013. The entire content of theforegoing applications is incorporated by reference in the presentapplication.

FIELD

The present disclosure relates generally to nuclear reactors. Moreparticularly, the present disclosure relates to molten salt nuclearreactors.

BACKGROUND

Molten salt reactors (MSRs) were primarily developed from the 1950s to1970s but, as of late, there has been increasing world interest in thistype of reactor. Older concepts are being re-evaluated and new ideas putforth. This class of nuclear reactor has a great deal of advantages overcurrent nuclear reactors, the advantages including potentially lowercapital costs, overall safety, long lived waste profile and resourcesustainability.

With MSRs advantages also come some significant technological challengeswhich lead to difficult basic design decisions. The first and likelyforemost is whether and how a neutron moderator may be employed.Graphite has, in almost all cases, been chosen as a moderator as itbehaves very well in contact with the fluoride salts used in MSRs. Thesesalts are eutectic mixtures of fissile and fertile fluorides (UF4, ThF4,PuF3, etc.) with other carrier salts such as LiF, BeF2 or NaF. Usinggraphite as a bulk moderator within the core of the MSR has manyadvantages. For example, it gives a softer or more thermalized neutronspectrum which provides improved reactor control and a greatly loweredstarting fissile inventory. As well, using graphite throughout the coreof a MSR allows the ability to employ what is known as an undermoderatedouter zone which acts as a net absorber of neutrons and helps shield theouter reactor vessel wall from damaging neutron exposure. The vessel,which contains the nuclear core, has typically been proposed as beingmade of a high nickel alloy such as Hastelloy® N; however, othermaterials are possible.

The use of graphite within the core of the MSR (i.e., within the neutronflux of a MSR) can have a serious drawback however. That is, thatgraphite will first shrink and then expand beyond its original volume asit is exposed to a fast neutron flux. Overall expansion of graphite(graphite core) occurs when the volume of the graphite (graphite core)is larger than its original volume, i.e., the volume preceding anyneutron irradiation. An upper limit of total fast neutron fluence can becalculated and operation of the MSR is such that this limit is notexceeded. This limit determines when the graphite would begin to expandbeyond its original volume and potentially damage surrounding graphiteelements or the reactor vessel itself. How long graphite can be usedwithin the reactor core is thus directly related to the local powerdensity and thus to the fast neutron flux it experiences. A low powerdensity core may be able to use the same graphite for several decades.This is the case for many previous reactors employing graphite such asthe British gas cooled Magnox and AGR reactors. They were extremelylarge and had a low power density for thermohydraulic reasons but, thispermitted an extremely long graphite lifetime. However, MSRs wouldbenefit from having a far higher power density and thus graphitelifetime can become an issue.

The scientists and engineers designing MSRs have long been faced withimportant design options. A first option is to simply design the reactorto be quite large and very low power density in order to get a full 30year or more lifetime out of the graphite. Thus one can seal all thegraphite within the vessel and the graphite can remain in the vessel forthe design life of the nuclear plant. Examples of this choice can befound in the studies of Oak Ridge National Laboratories (ORNL) in thelate 1970s and early 1980s. For example, ORNL™ 7207 proposes a 1000 MWereactor which was termed the “30 Year Once Through” design which wouldhave a large reactor vessel of approximately 10 meters in diameter andheight in order to avoid the need for graphite replacement. Much of thelater work by Dr. Kazuo Furukawa of Japan, on what are known as the FUJIseries of reactor designs, also chose this route of large, low powernuclear cores. These very large cores have obvious economicdisadvantages in terms of the sheer amount of material required tofabricate the core and reactor vessel, and in the excessive weight ofthe core. These challenges increase the cost and complexity of thesurrounding reactor building as would be understood by those trained inthe field. It should be added that a 30 year nuclear plant lifetime wasquite acceptable in the 1970s but by today's standards would be thoughtshort. 50 or 60 years is now desired and would mean a still larger coreto allow this lifetime without graphite replacement.

A second option often proposed is to employ a much smaller, higher powerdensity core but to plan for periodic replacement of the graphite. Thisapproach was commonly assumed in the work at Oak Ridge NationalLaboratories (ORNL) in the design of the Molten Salt Breeder Reactorfrom about 1968 to 1976 before the program was cancelled. This 1000 MWereactor design had an outer vessel of Hastelloy® N that would containhundreds of graphite elements fitting together and filling the vesselbut with passage channels for the molten salt fuel to flow and exit thecore to external heat exchangers. In this second option, the reactor hasmuch smaller dimensions which are of approximately 6 meters in diameterand height. In this case the graphite, particularly in the center of thecore with the highest fast neutron flux, only had an expected lifetimeof 4 years. Thus the reactor had to be designed to be shut down andopened up every 4 years to replace a large fraction of the graphiteelements. This may not sound overly difficult to those not trained inthe field but with molten salts, the fission products, some of which arerelatively volatile, are in the fuel salt and can also embed themselvesonto a surface layer of graphite and, for example, the inner metalsurfaces of the reactor vessel. Thus just opening the reactor vessel wasknown to be an operation that could be difficult to perform withoutallowing radioactive elements to spread into the surrounding containmentzone. As well, the design of the reactor vessel itself is more complexwhen it needs to be periodically opened. These challenges are why theroute of larger, lower power density cores were often chosen.

A third option is to try to omit the use of graphite altogether. This ispossible and results in reactors typically with a much harder neutronspectrum. An example of this choice is the Molten Salt Fast Reactor(MSFR) proposed by a consortium of French and other European researchersstarting around year 2005. It has very serious drawbacks however Forexample it requires upwards of five times the starting fissile load andany accidental exposure of the salt to a moderator, such as water oreven hydrogen content in concrete, could lead to criticality dangers.

Beyond the issue of graphite lifetime, there are also the somewhatrelated issues of the lifetime of the reactor vessel itself and of theprimary heat exchangers.

The reactor vessel wall may also have a limited lifetime due to neutronfluence with both thermal and fast neutrons potentially causingproblems. The most commonly proposed material being a high nickel alloy,such as Hastelloy® N, with reasonably well understood behaviour andallowed limits of neutron fluence. As such, a great deal of effort goesinto core design to limit the exposure of neutrons and/or lower theoperating temperature of the vessel wall. As well, adding thickness tothe wall may help as strength is lost with increased neutron exposure.This adds both weight and expense. It is thus a challenge to have a 30to 60 year lifetime of the reactor vessel itself.

Another design challenge is the primary heat exchangers which transferheat from the radioactive primary fuel salt to a secondary coolant salt.This coolant salt then typically transfers heat to a working media suchas steam, helium, CO2 etc. In some cases these heat exchangers areoutside or external the reactor vessel itself, which appears to be thecase for all 1950s to 1980s ORNL designs. They also may be locatedwithin the reactor vessel itself which has its own set of advantages andchallenges. One great advantage of internal heat exchangers is noradiation of significance need leave the reactor itself as onlysecondary coolant salt enters and leaves the vessel.

For both internal and external heat exchangers, the great challenge isin either servicing or replacing them. When a MSR is opened up, it canpotentially lead to radioactivity being released into a containment zoneor space, ORNL for example proposed common tube in shell heat exchangersexternal to the core, four heat exchanger units per 1000 MWe reactor. Inthe case of any tube leaks the operation was not to fix or plug tubesbut to open the shell and remove the entire tube bundle and replace witha new bundle. Only after a cooling period would a decision be made onrepair and reuse of the bundle or simple disposal. Thus it is clear thatprimary heat exchanger service and/or replacement techniques are a greatchallenge in MSR design.

Further, when either graphite or heat exchangers are replaced, then theissue of their safe storage must be also addressed as they will becomesignificantly radioactive during operation. This represents yet anotherchallenge in MSR overall plant design.

It should be further highlighted that the related nuclear design fieldof Fluoride salt cooled, High temperature Reactors (known as FHRs) hasvery similar issues. In this work the reactor design can be very similarbut instead of the fuel being in the fluoride salt, it is in solid formwithin the graphite moderator using the fuel form known as TRISO. Inthis case the limited graphite lifetime is also a function of thelifetime of the solid TRISO fuels; however, all other design issues andchallenges are very similar to MSR design work. In FHRs, the primarycoolant salt is not nearly as radioactive but does typically containsome radioactive elements such as tritium and a similar set ofchallenges are present when planning to use solid block TRISO fuels andperiodically replace them. A subset of FHR design involves using apebble fuel form which does ease fuel replacement without opening up thereactor vessel; however, this type of design has its own set of issues

The decay heat that follows the shutdown of a nuclear reactor followingthe loss of external cooling has been a long-standing industrychallenge. The incident at Fukushima Japan indicates the seriousness ofthe issue. If the decay heat is not removed quickly from the reactor,the temperature in the reactor rises to unacceptable levels. Thus thespeed with which the initial decay heat can be removed from the reactoris critical.

Therefore, improvements in nuclear reactors are desirable.

SUMMARY

The present disclosure relates to the integration of the primaryfunctional elements of graphite moderator and reactor vessel and/orprimary heat exchangers and/or control rods into a single replaceableunit having a higher and more economic power density while retaining theadvantages of a sealed unit. Once the design life of such an IntegralMolten Salt Reactor (IMSR) is reached, for example, in the range of 3 to10 years it is disconnected, removed and replaced as a unit and thisunit itself may also potentially function as the medium or long termstorage of the radioactive graphite and/or heat exchangers and/orcontrol rods and/or fuel salt itself. The functions of decay heatremoval and volatile off gas storage may also be integrated in situ.

The present disclosure also relates to nuclear reactor that has areactor vessel surrounded by a buffer material. The buffer material canabsorb decay heat when external cooling is lost. The absorption of decayheat is effected by the buffer material phase transition latent heat,the phase transition being that of solid phase to liquid phase. Theabsorption is also effected by convective heat transfer when the buffermaterial is in the liquid state. The convective heat transfer occursbetween the reactor vessel and a heat sink in thermal contact with thebuffer material.

In a first aspect of the disclosure, there is provided a method ofoperating a nuclear power plant, the nuclear power plant comprising amolten salt reactor (MSR) to produce heat, a heat exchanger system, andan end use system, the heat exchanger system to receive heat produced bythe MSR and to provide the received heat to the end use system. Themethod comprises operating the MSR, the MSR comprising a vessel, agraphite moderator core positioned in the vessel, and a molten saltcirculating at least in the vessel, the heat exchanger system having aninside portion located inside the vessel and an outside portion locatedoutside the vessel, the inside portion having a plurality of heatexchangers, each heat exchanger having an inlet conduit and an outletconduit, each inlet conduit and each outlet conduit extending from eachrespective heat exchanger, through the vessel, toward the outsideportion of the heat exchanger system and connecting each respective heatexchanger to the outside portion of the heat exchanger system, thevessel being sealed to permanently integrate the graphite core into thevessel. The method also comprises shutting down the MSR in response to ashutdown event occurring, to obtain a shut-down MSR. The method alsocomprises severing any operational connection between the inlet conduitsand the outlet conduits of the shut-down MSR and the outside portion ofthe heat exchanger system, to obtain a severed, shut-down MSR;sequestering the severed, shut-down MSR; and operationally connecting areplacement MSR to the outside portion of the heat exchanger systemlocated outside the vessel of the replacement MSR.

In a second aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a methodof operating a nuclear power plant, the nuclear power plant comprising amolten salt reactor (MSR) to produce heat, a heat exchanger system, andan end use system, the heat exchanger system to receive heat produced bythe MSR and to provide the received heat to the end use system. Themethod comprises operating the MSR, the MSR comprising a vessel, agraphite moderator core positioned in the vessel, and a molten saltcirculating at least in the vessel, the heat exchanger system to receiveheat from the molten salt. The method also comprises shutting down theMSR after a pre-determined duration of operation, to obtain a shut-downMSR; severing any operational connection between the shut-down MSR andany portion of the heat exchanger system located outside the vessel, toobtain a severed, shut-down MSR; sequestering the severed, shut-downMSR; and operationally connecting a replacement MSR to any portion ofthe heat exchanger system located outside the vessel of the replacementMSR.

Other aspects and features of the present disclosure will becomeapparent to those ordinarily skilled in the art upon review of thefollowing description of specific embodiments in conjunction with theaccompanying figures.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments of the present disclosure will now be described, by way ofexample only, with reference to the attached figures

FIG. 1A shows an embodiment of a molten salt nuclear reactor inaccordance with the present disclosure.

FIG. 1B shows a molten salt nuclear reactor operationally connected to adump tank.

FIG. 2 shows a top view of the embodiment of FIG. 1 .

FIG. 3 shows, in accordance with the present disclosure, inlet andoutlet molten salt conduits arranged to be shutoff when radioactivity isdetected in the molten salt conduits or when a pressure change isdetected in the molten salt conduits.

FIG. 4 shows another embodiment of a molten salt nuclear reactor inaccordance with the present disclosure.

FIG. 5 shows a top view of the embodiment of FIG. 4 .

FIG. 6 shows yet another embodiment of a molten salt nuclear reactor inaccordance with the present disclosure.

FIG. 7 shows a further embodiment of a molten salt nuclear reactor inaccordance with the present disclosure.

FIG. 8 shows an additional embodiment of a molten salt nuclear reactorin accordance with the present disclosure.

FIG. 9 shows a flowchart of a method according to certain examples ofthe present disclosure.

FIG. 10 shows a nuclear power plant according to certain examples of thepresent disclosure.

FIG. 11 shows another embodiment of a nuclear reactor in accordance withthe present disclosure.

FIG. 12 shows yet another embodiment of a nuclear reactor in accordancewith the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present disclosure provides an integral Molten Salt Reactor (IMSR).The IMSR of the present disclosure has a graphite core that ispermanently integrated with the vessel of the IMSR, which means that thegraphite core is in the vessel of IMSR for the lifetime of the IMSR. Assuch, in the IMSR of the present disclosure, the graphite core is not areplaceable graphite core and remains within the IMSR for theoperational lifetime of the IMSR. The graphite core is fixedly securedwithin the vessel of the IMSR. Advantageously, this eliminates the needfor any apparatus that would be required for replacing the graphite coreat pre-determined moments as per a pre-determined schedule. A furtheradvantage is that the IMSR does not require any access port to allowaccess to the graphite core for replacement of the graphite core. Anadditional advantage of the IMSR of the present disclosure is that,after expiration of the design lifetime of the IMSR, the IMSR serves asa storage container for any radioactive matter within the IMSR. Thecomponents of the IMSR include the reactor vessel itself and anygraphite elements of the nuclear core. Other components can include theprimary heat exchangers which can be installed, in the reactor vessel,during fabrication of the IMSR. The IMSR is built to operate (produceelectricity) for a design lifetime, which takes into account thereactor's graphite core expansion over time and the structural integrityof the graphite core. That is, as mentioned above in the backgroundsection, the graphite core will eventually expand beyond its originalvolume under neutron flux. Operation of MSRs in the presence of suchexpansion is not desirable as the graphite core can suffer breaks. TheIMSR of the present disclosure is simply shut down and replaced afterexpiration of its design lifetime. Further components of the IMSR caninclude piping such as coolant salt inlet conduits and outlet conduits,and the pump shaft and impeller for moving (pumping) the coolant salt(primary coolant fluid) when a pump is employed.

In some embodiments of the present disclosure, an IMSR that has beenshut down can simply remain in its containment zone (hot cell) that canact as a heat sink for the decay heat generated by the shut down IMSR.The decay heat simply radiates out the IMSR through the IMSR's vesselwall and into the containment zone and ultimately to the outsideenvironment. MSRs typically operate at temperatures in the region of 700degrees C., radiant heat is very effective in removing decay heat.Further, to accelerate decay heat removal, the IMSR of the presentdisclosure, a buffer salt can be added in the containment zone tosurround the IMSR; this allows faster heat extraction from the IMSR tothe containment zone. In certain embodiments the IMSR can have a frozenplug of salt that can be melted to allow the primary coolant drain todecay heat removal tanks.

In some other embodiment, during operation of the IMSR and after shutdown of the IMSR, the IMSR can be a sealed unit that simply retainsproduced fission gases within the IMSR sealed vessel or, the fissiongases can be release slowly to any suitable fission gases treatmentsystem.

In the present disclosure, elements can be said to be operationallyconnected to each other when, for example, information in one elementcan be communicated to another element through a connection between theelements. The connection can be an electrical connection. Further,elements can be said to be operationally connected when state of oneelement can be controlled by, or related to a state of another element.

Further, in the present disclosure, elements can be said to be in fluidcommunication when fluid present at one element can flow to the otherelement.

FIG. 1A shows the frontal view of an embodiment of an IMSR 90 of thepresent disclosure. 100 is the reactor vessel itself, made of Hastelloy®N, a high nickel alloy, or any other suitable material such themolybdenum alloy TZM (titanium-zirconium-molybdenum alloy). The reactorvessel 100 can be referred to as a sealed reactor vessel in the sensethat any graphite core within the reactor vessel 100 is sealed therein;that is, it meant to remain within the reactor vessel 100, and not bereplaced during the operational lifetime of the IMSR. As the IMSR 100 ofthe present disclosure can have a short design life (e.g., 5 years), thewalls of the reactor vessel 100 can be thinner than required for MSRsthat have a 30+ year design life and can be allowed to operate in a muchhigher neutron fluence, or at a higher operating temperature than suchlong lifetime MSRs. 102 shows the core or core region which can be asimple mass of graphite defining channels 115 for a molten salt fuel 108to flow through. The channels can also be referred to as through holes.The core 102 can also be referred to as core region, a graphitemoderator core, and a graphite neutron moderator core. As the core 102of the embodiment of FIG. 1A does not need to be replaced, theconstruction of the core 102 can be simplified in that it does requireany structural features that would allow and/or facilitate its removalfrom the vessel 100 or its replacement. 104 shows a reflector (neutronreflector) to reflect neutrons toward the core 102 and to shield theprimary heat exchanger unit 106 from excessive neutron flux. Thereflector 104 can be optional. In the absence of the reflector 104 anymetallic structure, for example, conduits and heat exchangers located inthe IMSR above the core 102 would likely suffer neutron damage. Thereflector 104 can be made of stainless steel as it serves no structuralpurpose so irradiation damage of the reflector 104 is of little concern.The reflector 104 has channels 99 or piping defined therein to allow themolten salt fuel 108 to flow from the primary heat exchanger unit 106through the channels 115 defined by the core 102. The channels 115 canbe varied in either diameter or lattice pitch in different areas of thecore 102 to create, for example, an undermoderated region as well as anouter reflector zone in the graphite, as would be understood by thosetrained in the field. In the IMSR example of FIG. 1A, the flow of themolten salt fuel 108 in the vessel 100 is shown by the arrows 109.

The primary heat exchanger unit 106 has an opening 117 that receives thefuel salt 109 provided by the drive shaft and impeller unit 116, whichis driven by a pump 118. The primary heat exchanger unit 106 contains aseries of heat exchangers. Such a heat exchanger is shown at referencenumeral 119. Each heat exchanger 119 is connected to an inlet conduit114 and an outlet conduit 112 that propagate a coolant salt 113 (whichcan also be referred to as a secondary coolant salt) from the outside ofthe vessel 100, through the heat exchanger 119, to the outside of thevessel 100. The coolant salt 113 flows through the inlet conduit 114,heat exchanger 119, and outlet conduit 112 in the direction depicted byarrows 111. The coolant salt 113 receives heat from heat exchanger 119,which receives the heat from the fuel salt 108 that flows on, orcirculates around, the heat exchanger 119. The secondary coolant salt113 is pumped by a pump or pumping system (not shown). For claritypurposes, the heat exchanger 119 is shown as a straight conduitconnecting the inlet conduit 114 to the outlet conduit; however, aswould be understood by the skilled worker, the heat exchanger 119 can beof any suitable shape and can include any number of conduits connectingthe inlet conduit 114 to the outlet conduit 112. As an example, a heatexchanger can have a manifold structure where coolant salt circulatingin a main conduit is divided into a plurality of conduits stemming fromthe main conduit. Further, each heat exchanger can be individually shutdown upon occurrence of a heat exchanger fault and the nuclear reactorcan continue to operate with a reduced number of functioning heatexchangers.

The heat exchanger unit 106, the heat exchangers 119 it comprises, andthe inlet conduits 114 and outlet conduits 112 connected to the heatexchangers 119 are all part of a heat exchanger system that is used totransfer heat from the IMSR to a system (an end use system) or apparatussuch as, for example, a steam generator. Such a heat exchanger system isshown elsewhere in the disclosure, in relation to a nuclear power plant.The inlet conduits 114 and the outlet conduits 112 are operationallyconnected to a pump system—not shown—which is also part of the heatexchanger system. That is, the pump system circulates the coolant saltthrough the inlet conduits 114, the outlet conduits 112, and the heatexchangers 119. The inlet conduits 114 and the outlet conduits 112 canbe operationally connected to additional heat exchangers that providethe heat of the coolant salt circulating the heat exchangers 119, theinlet conduits 114 and the outlet conduits 112 to another medium, suchas, for example, another fluid such as water.

In the example of FIG. 1A, the heat exchanger system is partly comprisedin the vessel 100 as the heat exchangers 119 and a portion of inletconduit 114 and the inlet conduit 112 are inside the vessel 100.Further, the heat exchanger system is partly outside the vessel 100 inthat another portion of the inlet conduit 114 and the outlet conduit 112are outside the vessel 100, as are the aforementioned pump system andany additional heat exchanger. That is to say, that the heat exchangersystem has an inside portion located inside the vessel 100, and anoutside portion located outside the vessel 100.

Also in the example of FIG. 1A, the molten fuel salt circulates only inthe vessel 100. That is, under normal operating conditions, that is,conditions in which no break in equipment occurs, the molten fuel salt108 does not leave the vessel 100.

The IMSR 90 is positioned in a hot cell whose function is to preventradiation or radioactive elements, present or generated in the IMSR 90,from traversing the hot cell walls. Such a hot cell cell wall is partlyshown at reference numeral 130. The outlet conduit 112, and the inletconduit 114, can pass through openings in the hot cell wall 130 and canreach a secondary heat exchanger (not depicted) giving heat to either athird loop of working fluid or to the final working media such as steamor gas.

The level of molten fuel salt 108 within the reactor vessel is depictedby reference numeral 122. Fission gasses will collect above this liquidlevel 112 and may be retained in the vessel 100 or be allowed totransit, through an off gas line 120, to an off gas sequestration area(not depicted). These off gasses can be moved to the sequestration areaby a helium entrainment system (not depicted).

An example of the dimensions of the IMSR of FIG. 1A may be 3.5 meters indiameter, 7-9 meters in height, and may provide a total power of 400MW_(thermal) (up to about 200 MW_(electrical)) This power density wouldgive a graphite lifetime and thus design lifetime of the IMSR ofsomewhere between 5 and 10 years. These dimensions of the IMSR 90 maketransport and replacement of the IMSR 90 manageable and the powerdensity allows many years of usage of any graphite employed. Thegeometry of the core 102 and vessel 100 can be cylindrical.

The core 102 can be fitted with, or connected to, one or more stressmonitors 902 that monitor the stress (shear stress, normal stress, orboth) that may develop in the core 102 over time, as the core issubjected to neutrons. The stress monitors are operationally connectedto a control system 901 and, upon the stress measured by the stressmonitors 902 exceeding a predetermined threshold value, the monitoringsystem can shut down the IMSR 90. The one or more stress monitors(stress sensors, strain sensors, stress detectors, stress gauges, straingauges) can include, for example, a ring surrounding the core with astrain gauge connected (mounted) to the ring. Any overall expansion ofthe graphite will create stress in the ring. The stress in the ring isbe detected by the strain gauge mounted on the ring. The one or morestress monitors can also include a stress monitor mounted on any otherpart that is secured to the core. For example, in instances where thecore is mounted to a mounting plate, a stress monitor can be secured tothe mounting plate. Stress in the core will transfer to the mountingplate and will be sensed by the stress sensor. The stress monitors canbe, for example, electrical in nature in that the resistance of thestress monitor will change as a function of stress. The stress monitorsmay also be mechanical or optical (e.g., optical fiber stress gauge).

In some embodiments, it is possible to determine the neutron fluence onthe core 102. That is, it is possible to determine the number ofneutrons per cm² received by the core 102. It may also be possible tomonitor the fluence only for fast neutrons, e.g., for neutrons having anenergy above a particular energy level (e.g., 50 KeV). One possiblemethod of determining the neutron fluence would be by inferring theneutron fluence by determining (measuring) local power density which isdirectly related to both fission power and fast neutron fluence. Forexample by placing simple thermocouples separated by a short distancewithin a single salt channel in the core, the temperature difference andflow rate could be used to infer local power density. The IMSR can beshut down automatically or manually when the total neutron fluence meetsa threshold criteria. For example, the IMSR can be shut down when theneutron fluence approaches a pre-determined value beyond which the coregraphite 102 would likely deform or crack.

The IMSR 90 can be shutdown in any suitable manner. For example, andwith reference to FIG. 1B, upon occurrence of a shutdown event such asexcessive strain in the core 102 or excessive neutron fluence on thecore 102, the molten fuel salt 108 can be dumped in a dump tank 903located below the vessel 90. Such dump tanks can have any suitablegeometry, provided the geometry in question does not give rise tocriticality. The dump tank 903 can be connected to the vessel throughany suitable valve mechanism 904. One such valve mechanism is freezeplug, which comprises a portion of a conduit connecting the vessel 30 tothe dump tank. The portion of the conduit is filled with a material thatis maintained in the solid state by powered cooling (not shown). Thematerial can be a portion of the fuel salt itself. When the coolingstops, for whatever reason such as controlled shutdown or a loss ofexternal cooling of the reactor, the material melts, opening the valvemechanism 902, and the molten fuel salt 108 falls into the dump tank903.

Another example of a valve mechanism 904 is that of a mechanical valveheld in the open position by springs, and held in the closed position bypowered solenoids (not shown). As with power of the powered coolingbeing remove or lost when power is cut or lost in the solenoids, thesolenoids will de-energize and the valve will revert to its openposition, under the force of the springs, and the molten fuel salt willfall into the dump tank.

In the freeze plug example and the mechanical valve example, the controlsystem 901 would cut-off power to, respectively, the cooling unit andthe solenoids upon occurrence of a shutdown event such as stress in thecore 102, or excessive neutron fluence at the core 102, or when externalcooling is lost (failure/shutdown of the heat exchanger system).

As another example, upon detection of a shutdown event, the controlsystem 901 can cause a control rod 902 to be lowered in the vessel 90.The control rod 905 can be maintained out of the vessel 90 by a powereddevice 906 (e.g., a powered solenoid arrangement) as long as there ispower provided to the powered device. Upon occurrence of a shutdownevent or loss of external cooling of the reactor, the control system 901shuts off the power to the powered device and the control rod lowers inthe vessel 90.

FIG. 2 shows a top down view of the top of an example of an IMSR of thepresent disclosure. FIG. 2 shows the pump motor 118, and the off gasline 120. As well, FIG. 2 shows a series of four inlet conduits 114 andfour outlet conduits 114 passing from the reactor vessel 100 through theprimary hot cell wall 130. Four separate pairs of lines (one pair oflines has one inlet conduit 114 and one outlet conduit 112) aredepicted; however, any suitable number of such pairs of lines (andassociated heat exchanger 119) is also within the scope of the presentdisclosure. Each pair of lines is connected to a heat exchangercomprised in the heat exchanger unit 106.

An advantage of keeping primary heat exchangers within the IMSR andsimply replacing the IMSR after its design lifetime, is that techniquesfor heat exchanger repair, removal, and/or replacement need not bedeveloped. However plans must be made for potential failure and leakagebetween the primary fuel salt and secondary coolant. Bycompartmentalising the primary heat exchanger unit 106 into multipleindependent heat exchangers 119, any failure of the heat exchangers 119and/or leakage of molten fuel salt 108 into the coolant 113 can beeffectively managed.

FIG. 3 shows an embodiment of a disconnect arrangement to cut off theflow of the secondary coolant 113 though the inlet conduits 114 andoutlet conduits 112 in the direction given by arrows 111. For claritypurposes, only one pair of lines (one inlet conduit 114 and one outletconduit 112) is shown in FIG. 3 . In the example of FIG. 3 , aradioactivity detector 300, for example, a Geiger counter is placed nextto an outlet line 112 and can detect any leak of radioactive primaryfuel salt into the outlet line 112. When radioactivity beyond apre-determined level is detected by the radioactivity detector 300, acontroller 301, connected to the radiation detector 301, controlsshutoff mechanisms 304 that are connected to the outlet conduit 112 andthe inlet conduit 114, to shut the outlet conduit 112 and itscorresponding inlet conduit 114. The shutoff mechanisms are to isolatethe individual heat exchanger 119 (not shown in FIG. 2 ) connected tothe now shut inlet conduit 114 and outlet conduit 112. The shutoffmechanisms 304 can also be to sever the physical connection along theinlet conduit 114 and the outlet conduit 112. The shutoff mechanisms caninclude any suitable type of shutoff valves and any suitable type ofcrimping devices, the latter to crimp shut the inlet conduit 114 and theinlet conduit 112. The shutoff mechanisms 304 can also include arefrigerating unit that can cool and freeze the coolant salt circulatingin a compromised inlet conduit or a compromised outlet conduit. Suchfreezing would occur in a segment of the compromised conduit (inlet oroutlet) and stop the flow of coolant salt. In some embodiments, wherethe inlet and/or outlet conduits are substantial in diameter and hencedifficult to freeze, the conduits can be mechanically stretched toreduce their diameter and the sections of the conduits having thereduced diameter can be frozen.

Further, if a leak of secondary coolant fluid 113 into the molten fuelsalt 108 occurs, it can be detected by measuring a drop in pressure,using one or more pressure detectors 303 mounted in or otherwiseoperationally connected to the inlet conduit 114, the outlet conduit 112or both. The one or more pressure detectors are operationally connectedto the controller 301, which can shut off the shutoff mechanisms 304upon determining that a drop in pressure (or any abnormal change inpressure) has occurred in the coolant salt 113 circulating in the inletconduit 114, outlet conduit 112, or both. Furthermore, when a leak ofsecondary coolant fluid 113 into the molten fuel salt 108 occurs, it canbe detected by monitoring (e.g., periodically monitoring) the level ofmolten salt in the reactor vessel. If the level of molten salt rises,then it can be attributed to a leak of secondary coolant salt.

In some embodiments, each pair or group of pairs of inlet conduit andoutlet conduit can be connected to a distinct coolant pump. When a faultis detected in one of the pairs, the pump to which the pair isassociated can be shut down and the conduit in question can be crimped,frozen or otherwise disabled by a shutoff mechanism. Provided that allthe coolant pumps are not shutdown, the nuclear reactor can stillfunction.

By choosing compatible primary carrier salts for the molten fuel salt108 and the secondary coolant salt 113, mixing of these fluids can betolerated. For example, if the primary carrier salt is LiF—BeF2 and/orNaF—BeF2, then a secondary coolant salt of LiF—BeF2 and/or NaF—BeF2would be compatible with the primary carrier salt in cases of limitedmixing, i.e. in cases where the volume of coolant salt 113 leaked ininto the molten fuel salt 108 is tolerable in terms of its effects onneutron production and absorption. By having many, perhaps 4 but even upto 10 or more pairs of inlet conduits/outlet conduits (and correspondingheat exchangers 119), the loss of one or more individual heat exchangersmay do little to the overall ability to transfer heat from the primaryheat exchanger unit 106 to the coolant salt 113 as the other remainingpairs of inlet conduits/outlet conduits can simply take the added heatexchange load or the IMSR can lower its power rating slightly. Heatexchangers are unlike many other systems in that there is very littleeconomy of scale such that 10 smaller pairs of inlet/outlets or tubebundles will not have a combined cost much more than one large unit.

FIG. 4 shows another embodiment of an IMSR 92 in accordance with thepresent disclosure. As in the IMSR 90 of FIG. 1A, the IMSR 92 of FIG. 4comprises a vessel 100, a reflector 104 and a core 102. Additionally,the IMSR 92 comprises a control rod 400 (which can be optional) and aseries of heat exchanger units 106. Each heat exchanger unit has a driveshaft and impeller unit 116 to pump molten fuel salt 108 through theheat exchanger units 106. For clarity purposes, pump motors that drivethe shaft and impeller units 116 are not shown. Also for claritypurposes, inlet conduits and outlets conduits propagating a coolant saltthrough the heat exchanger units 106 are not shown.

The molten salt fuel 108 that is pumped through the heat exchanger units106 is directed downwards, towards the periphery of the core 102 by abaffle structure 402. The molten fuel salt flows towards the bottom ofthe vessel 100 and then upwards through the channels 115 of the core102. Although two channels 115 are shown in FIG. 4 , any suitable numberof channels 115 is within the scope of the present disclosure.

FIG. 5 shows a top, cross-sectional view of the MSR 92 shown at FIG. 4 .The top view of FIG. 5 shows 8 heat exchanger units 106, each having aninlet conduit 114, an outlet conduit 112, and a pump shaft and impellerunit 116. Also shown is the control rod 400.

FIG. 6 shows a side perspective view of the IMSR of FIG. 4 . The IMSR 92comprises six heat exchanger units 106, each having an inlet conduit114, outlet conduit 112, and shaft and impeller unit 116. The heatexchanger units 106 are positioned above the core 102 and about alongitudinal axis of the vessel, the longitudinal axis being parallel tothe control rod 400. The direction of flow of the molten fuel salt 108is indicated by arrow 109. After exiting the individual heat exchangers106, the molten fuel 108 flows obliquely down, guided by the bafflestructure 402 and, optionally, by partitions 404 that separate theoutputs of the individual heat exchanger units.

The flow of the molten fuel salt 108 through the core 102 may be indifferent directions in different embodiments, for example upwards asshown in the embodiment of FIG. 4 or downwards as shown in theembodiment of FIG. 1A. There are advantages and disadvantages to bothupwards and downwards flow directions. An upward flow through the coreas shown in FIG. 4 has the advantage of being in the same direction asnatural circulation but can make the use of pumps (the pumps pumping thecoolant salt through the heat exchanger units) slightly more difficultto direct the flow through the primary heat exchangers.

In some embodiments of the present disclosure, the pumps and the shaftand impeller units can be omitted and the MSR can instead use naturalcirculation to circulate the molten fuel salt 108. As such, the pumpsand the shaft and impeller units can be optional in embodiments wherenatural circulation suffices to circulate the molten salt fuel 108. FIG.7 shows an embodiment where natural circulation of the molten fuel salt108 is used. The MSR 94 of FIG. 7 is similar to the MSR 92 of FIG. 6with the exception that no pumps or shaft an impeller units arerequired. Rather, the molten fuel salt 108 present in the channels 115heats up through nuclear fission reaction and flows upwards towards thetop region of the vessel 100. Once outside the channels 115, the moltensalt cools down and begins to flow downwards, through the heatexchangers 105, and towards the bottom of the vessel 100 where thecooled molten fuel salt re-enters the channels to be heated up.

FIG. 8 shows another embodiment of an IMSR in accordance with thepresent disclosure. The IMSR 96 of FIG. 8 has a vessel 100 in which ispositioned a graphite moderator core 102, which can have one or morechannels 115 defined therein. The vessel 100 is connected to a heatexchanger unit 106 that is located outside the vessel 100. The heatexchanger unit 106 contains a plurality of heat exchangers (not shown);each heat exchanger includes an inlet conduit 114 and an outlet conduit112 that circulate coolant salt though the heat exchanger. Each inletconduit 114 and outlet conduit 112 is operationally connected to acoolant salt pump system (not shown). The inlet conduit 114 and theoutlet conduit 112 are shown traversing a hot cell wall 130. The vessel100 is connected to the heat exchanger unit 106 through conduits 700 and702. A pump 704 circulates a molten fuel salt 706 through the vessel100, the channels 115, and the heat exchanger 106. The sameconfiguration of radioactivity detector, pressure detectors 303,shut-off mechanisms, and controller shown at FIG. 3 , can also beapplied to the embodiment of FIG. 8 . The core 102 can be fitted withone or more stress monitors 902 that monitor the stress (shear stress,normal stress, or both) that may develop in the core 102 over time, asthe core is subjected to neutrons. The stress monitors are operationallyconnected a monitoring system (not shown and, upon the stress measuredby the stress monitors 902 exceeding a predetermined threshold value,the monitoring system can shut down the IMSR 96.

Upon the graphite moderator core 102 reaching its operational lifetime,the conduits 700 and 702 can be severed to physically disconnect thevessel 100 from the remainder of the IMSR. After sealing the cut-offportion of the conduits 700 and 702 attached to the vessel 100, thevessel 100 can be disposed in a containment facility and a new vesselwith a new graphite moderator core can be attached to the conduits 700and 702.

The IMSR embodiments shown at FIGS. 1-8 were described has having amolten fuel salt (108 or 706) circulating therein. However,modifications to the embodiments of FIGS. 1-8 would allow the IMSRsshown therein to operate on a solid nuclear fuel comprised within thecore 102 as opposed to being comprised in the molten fuel salt. Forexample, in the embodiment of FIG. 1A, the molten fuel salt can bereplaced by a fuel-free (nuclear fuel-free) molten salt and the core 102can comprise solid nuclear fuel such as TRISO fuels. Further, as nofission gasses are released in such solid fuel IMSRs, there would be noneed for the off gas line 120. As previously described however, thereare similar advantages to the invention of integrating a sealed solidfuel core into the replaceable IMSR unit.

FIG. 9 shows a block diagram of an embodiment of a nuclear power plant2000 that includes an MSR 2002 such as, any one of IMSR 90, 92, 94, and96 described above in relation to FIGS. 1, 4, 6, 7, and 8 . The MSR 2002generates heat and provides the generated heat to a heat exchangersystem 2004. The heat exchanger system 2004 can include the heatexchanger unit 106 disposed in the vessel 100, which also includes agraphite moderator core 102 and is discussed above in relation FIGS. 1,4, 6, and 7 . With respect to MSR 96 shown at FIG. 8 , the heatexchanger system 2004 can include the heat exchanger unit 106, which islocated outside the vessel 100 that includes the graphite moderator core102. Additionally, the heat exchanger system 2004 of FIG. 9 can includeadditional heat exchangers that receive the heat from the above notedheat exchanger units 106. The nuclear power plant 2000 of FIG. 9includes an end-use system 2006 that receives heat from the heatexchanger system 2004 and uses that heat to do work. For example, theend-use system 2006 can include a heat exchanger apparatus thattransport the heat received from the heat exchanger system 2004 to anindustrial apparatus that uses that heat. An example of such anindustrial apparatus includes a cement kiln. In other embodiments, theend-use system 2006 can include a steam generator that uses the heatreceived from the heat exchanger system 2004 to produce steam thatpowers a turbine system, which can be used to power an electricalgenerator. In further embodiments, the end-use system 2006 can include asteam generator that uses the heat received from the heat exchangersystem 2004 to produce steam that is used for bitumen extraction frombituminous sands (e.g., steam assisted gravity drainage).

FIG. 10 shows a flowchart of a method according to certain examples ofthe present disclosure. The method shown at FIG. 10 is a method ofoperating a nuclear power plant. The nuclear power plant comprises anuclear reactor (e.g., an MSR) that generates heat (thermal energy) anda heat exchanger system. The nuclear reactor comprises a vessel, agraphite moderator core positioned in the vessel, and a molten saltcirculating at least in the vessel. In embodiments where the nuclearreactor is an MSR, the molten salt is a molten fuel salt. The nuclearreactor heats the molten salt and the heat exchanger system receives theheat from the molten salt.

The method of FIG. 10 includes, at action 1000, operating the nuclearreactor. At action 1002, the MSR is shut down upon occurrence of ashutdown event. Shutdown events can include, for example, a detection ofstrain in the graphite moderator core the neutron fluence on thegraphite moderator exceeding a maximum fluence level, and an operationduration of the nuclear reactor exceeding a pre-determined operationduration. The pre-determined duration of operation is determined inrelation to maintaining the structural integrity of the graphitemoderator core positioned in the vessel of the MSR and in relation tothe operation conditions under which the MSR operates. For a givengraphite moderator core, when the pre-determined operation conditionsare such that the graphite moderator core is subjected to low peak powerdensities and low average power densities, the pre-determined durationof operation will be longer than when the pre-determined operationconditions are such that the graphite moderator core is subjected tohigh peak power densities and high average power densities. An MSRhaving a peak power density of 20 MW_(thermal)/m³ would result in thepre-determined duration of operation being about 11.5 years when runningat full capacity, and about 15 years when running at 75% capacity. It isenvisaged that the operational time (duration) of a practical IMSR willbe less than 15 years and thus, will have a peak power density higherthan 20 MW_(thermal)/m³.

At action 1004, all operational connections between the inside portionof the heat exchanger system and the outside portion of the heatexchanger system are severed. This results in a severed, shut-downnuclear reactor. That is, any type of conduit connected to the nuclearand used to transfer heat from the nuclear reactor to any part of theheat exchanger system located outside the vessel is severed. Further,electrical connections for pump motors and monitoring instrumentation,small conduits for makeup fuel salt addition, salt sampling, off gasremoval and a dip line for the removal of the fuel salt can also besevered when, for example, the severed shutdown nuclear reactor is to bemoved or sequestered

At action 1006, a replacement nuclear reactor can be obtained and, ataction 1008, the inner heat exchanger system portion of the replacementnuclear reactor is connected to the outside portion of the heatexchanger system. If applicable, any other electrical connections forpump motors and monitoring instrumentation, small conduits for makeupfuel salt addition, salt sampling, off gas removal and a dip line forthe removal of the fuel salt of the replacement nuclear reactor can bemade.

At action 1001, if fault in a heat exchanger is detected, the flow ofcoolant salt in the faulty heat exchanger can be stopped. At action1005, the severed, shutdown nuclear reactor can be sequestered.

To shut down the nuclear reactor, a control rod (shutdown rod) can beused or, in embodiments where the nuclear reactor is an MSR, by drainingthe molten fuel salt to an external storage such as a dump tank. Thecoolant lines can then be sealed and/or crimped and disconnected alongwith any other lines such as off gas lines. Examples of coolant linesare shown in FIG. 1 as inlet conduit 114 and outlet conduit 112. Afterdisconnecting these lines the spent nuclear reactor, i.e., the reactorvessel and all remaining conduit segments attached thereto, can beremoved, for example, by using an overhead crane. Such operations mightbe done after a period of in situ cool down for radiation levels todiminish. In such a mode, likely the next unit (i.e., the replacementnuclear reactor) can be installed adjacent the spent IMSR such that,long term, while one unit operates, the other is cooling down and thenreplaced before the operating unit is finished its cycle. Using anoverhead crane for removal may involve some mechanism to breach theprimary hot cell.

The pump motor (see reference numeral in FIG. 1 ), when present, can berecycled, for example by, cutting it from the shaft of the impeller towhich the pump motor is connected. The rest of the spent nuclear reactorcan be transferred off site or to another area of the nuclear powerplant, perhaps even within the primary hot cell. As an option, the unitmight also be used for the short, medium or even long term storage ofthe primary fuel salt itself, perhaps after some or all actinides areremoved for recycle or alternate storage. Thus the spent nuclear reactormay act as a storage and/or disposal canister for the internal graphite,primary heat exchangers and even the salt itself. At some point adecision on long term sequestration would have to be made butpotentially the entire unit could be lowered into an undergroundlocation such as deep borehole made on site or transported to a saltcavern for safe long term sequestration.

Some comment on the overall economic viability is perhaps of use as itgoes against the often imposed logic of attempting to get the longestservice life as possible from all components. The advantages seem togreatly outweigh any economic penalty of decreased capital amortizationtime. First, there may be little change in the overall need of graphiteover the lifetime of the nuclear plant itself as would be understood bythose trained in the field. Second, the components now having a shorterdesign life such as the reactor vessel and/or primary heat exchangerstypically make up only a small fraction of the nuclear plant costs. Instudies by Oak Ridge National Laboratories, such as in ORNL 4145 thecost of the reactor vessel and primary heat exchangers were only around10% of the plant cost. The ability to lower the cost of these items bythe great simplifications allowed by having a sealed replaceable unitwould seem to more than make up for the lowered amortization time. Whenthe decreased research and development costs are factored in, theadvantage of this disclosed design seem clear.

FIG. 11 shows a top, cross-sectional view of a further embodiment of anuclear reactor 1100 of the present disclosure. The nuclear reactor 1100has a nuclear reactor vessel, which has a nuclear reactor vessel wall1104 and, the nuclear reactor vessel 1102 is contained in a containmentvessel 1106, which has a containment vessel wall 1108. Between thenuclear reactor vessel wall 1104 and the containment vessel wall 1108 isa buffer salt 1110. The nuclear reactor wall 1104 is made of a thermallyconductive material, for example, a nickel-base alloy such as Hastelloy®N. The buffer salt 1110 is in thermal contact with the nuclear reactorwall 1104.

Upon loss of electrical power to the heat exchanger system, the pumpspumping the coolant salt through the heat exchangers located inside thevessel will stop functioning. However, some of decay heat will continueto be transferred out the reactor vessel through natural circulation:that is, the coolant salt in the reactor vessel will heat up andcirculate through the secondary heat exchangers (secondary heatexchanger loops) system by convection. As such, provided the heatexchanger system remains able to shed some of the heat received bynuclear reactor, severe consequences, such as damaging the metallicstructure of the nuclear reactor vessel, can be avoided.

However, upon a catastrophic event, for example an earthquake, where theheat exchanger system becomes thoroughly defective, i.e., is no longerable to transfer any significant heat from the nuclear reactor 1102, thenuclear reactor 1102 can no longer transfer the decay heat generatedtherein and failure to properly manage the decay heat can lead to severeconsequences.

In accordance with the present disclosure, the decay heat can be safelymanaged by selecting a buffer salt 1110 that acts as a phase transitionheat sink. When used in MSRs, the buffer salt provides an alternative tothe freeze plug and dump tank approach often used in MSRs. The virtue ofthe embodiment of FIG. 11 is the ability to passively dissipate thedecay heat that is produced by nuclear reactors after the loss ofexternal cooling (i.e., when the heat exchanger system can no longertransfer any significant heat from the nuclear reactor). The embodimentof FIG. 11 enables the dissipation of the decay-heat surge even whenthere is loss of external cooling, thereby avoiding severe consequences.

As an example, the nuclear reactor 1100 can be considered to be an MSRthat runs at about 650° C. and produces thermal energy at a rate of 80MW_(th) (full power value) and the nuclear reactor vessel wall 1104 isat 650° C. Upon shutdown, the decay heat generated by the nuclearreactor will be, averaged over the first two days, about 0.5% of thefull power value and the temperature of the nuclear reactor vessel wall1104 will increase.

When the buffer salt 1110 is 53% NaF-47% AlF₃ (density of 2.4 t/m³ with400 kJ/kg latent heat, melting point of 695° C.) and is 1 meter thick,the total mass of the buffer salt is about 177 tons and provides alatent heat of melting of 7.1×10¹⁰ joules. In this example, the buffersalt 1110 provides approximately 2 days of initial decay heat absorptioneven with an adiabatic assumption of no other heat loss. That is, itwill take about two days for the buffer salt 1110 to melt, i.e., abouttwo days for the temperature of the nuclear reactor vessel wall 1104 andof the buffer salt 1110 to reach the buffer salt's melting point of 695°C.

After the buffer salt has melted it remains in the containment vessel1106, surrounding the nuclear reactor 1102, the decay heat is no longerabsorbed by the buffer salt and needs to me managed otherwise. Severaloptions of managing the decay heat are available. For example, thecontainment vessel can be surrounded by water (a water jacket) 1112 thatwill be boiled off by the decay heat. In the present example the water1112 will boil off at a rate of about 8 liters/minute (this boil-offrate will decrease with time as less and less decay heat is generated).The boiled off water can be replenished by a water reservoir (notshown). A modest reservoir can supply water for many months, especiallyin view of the unrealistic adiabatic assumption; clearly, radiant andconductive heat will be dissipated into the building housing the nuclearand in the environment surrounding the water jacket. As such, therealistic water boil-off rate will be less that 8 liters/minute. Thewater jacket can be in the form of coiled piping surrounding thecontainment vessel and in thermal contact with the containment vesselwall 1108. The coiled piping is connected to the water reservoir. Inother embodiments, an air jacket can be used. The air jacket can be inthe form of coiled piping surrounding the containment vessel and inthermal contact with the containment vessel wall 1108. As will beunderstood by the skilled worker, in some embodiments, providing coolingto the containment vessel may cause a relatively thin layer of thebuffer salt adjoining the outside wall of the containment vessel toremain in the solid state when the temperature at the wall in questionis at, or below, the freezing point of the buffer salt. Such embodimentsare within the scope of the present disclosure.

The buffer salt 1110 can be selected to be a thermal insulator when inthe solid state and a thermal conductor when in the liquid (moltenbuffer salt) state. Specifically, the solid state thermal conductivityof the selected buffer salt is lower than the heat transfer capabilityof the liquid sate buffer salt. That is, convective heat transfer in theliquid state is significantly higher than conductive heat transfer inthe solid state. 53% NaF-47% AlF₃ is such a buffer salt. Having thebuffer salt 1110 acting as a thermal insulator during operation of thenuclear reactor reduced loss of heat generated by the nuclear reactionstaking place in the nuclear reactor vessel 1102.

FIG. 12 shows a top, cross-sectional view of a further embodiment of anuclear reactor 1114 of the present disclosure. As in the nuclearreactor 1100 of FIG. 11 , the nuclear reactor 1114 has a nuclear reactorvessel 1102, which has a nuclear reactor vessel wall 1104 and, thenuclear reactor vessel 1102 is contained in a containment vessel 1106,which has a containment vessel wall 1108, which can be referred to as anouter wall or as a containment vessel outer wall. Additionally, thecontainment vessel has an inner wall 116 (shown with dashed line) thatis in thermal contact with the nuclear reactor vessel wall 1104. Betweenthe inner wall 1116 and the containment vessel wall 1108 is the buffersalt 1110. The inner wall 1116 is thermally conductive and, as such, thebuffer salt 1110 is in thermal contact with the nuclear reactor wall1104. Advantageously, the nuclear reactor 1114 allows for removal of thenuclear reactor vessel 1102 from the containment vessel 1106 withouthaving to remove the buffer salt 1110. Also, a replacement nuclearreactor can be inserted in the containment vessel 1106.

Even though the above examples use 53% NaF-47% AlF₃ as a buffer salt,any other suitable buffer salt can be used. That is, salts that have amelting point above the operating temperature of the nuclear reactor andthat can act as a thermal insulator in the solid state and as a thermalconductor (by convection) in the liquid state can be used. Otherexamples of salts that can be used as buffer salts include: otherfluoride salts such as 66% NaF-34% ZrF4 (melting point of 640° C.) and26% KF-74% Zr4 (melting point of 700° C.); bromide salts such as NaBr(melting point of 747° C., latent heat of melting: 250 KJ/Kg) and KBr(melting point of 734° C.; and other salts such as MgCl (melting pointof 714° C., latent heat of melting; 360 kJ/Kg).

Even though the nuclear reactors of FIGS. 11 and 12 are shown withbuffer salts, other embodiments may use a buffer material other than abuffer salt. For example, the buffer salt 1110 of FIGS. 11 and 12 can bereplaced by pure aluminum (melting point of 660° C., latent heat ofmelting: 397 kJ/Kg). In this case, to avoid having excessive heattransfer between the nuclear vessel and the containment vessel duringnormal operation of the nuclear reactor, the aluminum can be in the formof balls, which allows for only some thermal contact betweenneighbouring balls and the nuclear reactor vessel wall and thecontainment vessel.

As with other nuclear reactors described herein, the nuclear reactorsshown at FIGS. 11 and 12 can also be disconnected, removed, and replacedas a unit, with or without the containment vessel.

In the preceding description, for purposes of explanation, numerousdetails are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding ofthe embodiments. However it will be apparent to one skilled in the artthat these specific details are not required.

The above described embodiments are intended to be examples only.Alterations, modifications and variations can be effected to theparticular embodiments by those skilled in the art without departingfrom the scope, to be defined solely in the accompanying claims.

The invention claimed is:
 1. A nuclear power plant comprising: a moltensalt reactor (MSR) to produce heat, the MSR comprising a vessel; a heatexchanger system; radioactivity detectors positioned outside the vessel;shutoff mechanisms positioned outside the vessel; and an end-use system,the MSR comprising a graphite moderator core positioned in the vessel,and a molten salt circulating at least in the vessel, the molten salt totransfer the heat produced by the MSR to the heat exchanger system, thegraphite moderator core defining one or more than one through hole, theheat exchanger system to receive the heat produced by the MSR and toprovide the received heat to the end use system, the heat exchangersystem comprising a plurality of heat exchangers in fluid communicationwith the one or more than one through hole of the graphite moderatorcore, each heat exchanger having associated thereto a respectiveradioactivity detector, each radioactivity detector arranged to detectradioactivity present in a coolant salt circulating in the respectiveheat exchanger, each shutoff mechanism arranged to shut off circulationof the coolant salt circulating in the respective heat exchanger whenradioactivity beyond a threshold amount is detected, by the respectiveradioactivity detector, in the respective heat exchanger.
 2. A nuclearpower plant comprising: a molten salt reactor (MSR) to produce heat, theMSR comprising a vessel; a heat exchanger system; radioactivitydetectors positioned outside the vessel; shutoff mechanisms positionedoutside the vessel; and an end-use system, the MSR comprising a graphitemoderator core positioned in the vessel, and a molten salt circulatingat least in the vessel, the molten salt to transfer the heat produced bythe MSR to the heat exchanger system, the graphite moderator coredefining one or more than one through hole, the vessel being sealed topermanently integrate the graphite core into the vessel, the heatexchanger system having an inside portion located inside the vessel andan outside portion located outside the vessel, the inside portioncomprising a plurality of heat exchangers in fluid communication withthe one or more than one through hole of the graphite moderator core,each heat exchanger having an inlet conduit and an outlet conduit, eachinlet conduit and each outlet conduit extending from each respectiveheat exchanger, through the vessel, toward the outside portion of theheat exchanger system and connecting each respective heat exchanger tothe outside portion of the heat exchanger system, each heat exchangerhaving associated thereto a respective radioactivity detector, eachradioactivity detector arranged to detect radioactivity present in acoolant salt circulating in the respective heat exchanger, each shutoffmechanism arranged to shut off circulation of the coolant saltcirculating in the respective heat exchanger when radioactivity beyond athreshold amount is detected, by the respective radioactivity detector,in the respective heat exchanger.
 3. The nuclear power plant of claim 1,wherein the molten salt is a molten fuel salt, the nuclear power plantfurther comprising a pump system to pump the molten fuel salt throughthe heat exchanger system and through the one or more than one throughhole of the graphite moderator core, the heat exchangers being arrangedin the heat exchanger unit to have the molten fuel salt flow thereon. 4.The nuclear reactor plant of claim 1 further comprising a pressuremonitoring system positioned outside the vessel, the pressure monitoringsystem arranged to monitor a pressure of the coolant salt circulating ineach of the heat exchangers, each shutoff mechanism arranged to shut offcirculation of the coolant salt circulating in the respective heatexchanger when the pressure monitoring system detects a pressure changein the respective heat exchanger.
 5. The nuclear power plant of claim 1wherein each respective heat exchanger has an inlet conduit and anoutlet conduit, each respective radioactivity detector of eachrespective heat exchanger being arranged to detect radioactivity presentin the coolant salt passing through at least one of the inlet conduitand the outlet conduit.
 6. The nuclear power plant of claim 2 whereineach respective radioactivity detector of each respective heat exchangerbeing arranged to detect radioactivity present in the coolant saltpassing through at least one of the inlet conduit and the outletconduit.
 7. The nuclear power plant of claim 2 wherein the shutoffmechanism of each respective heat exchanger is arranged to shut off aflow of the coolant salt in each of the inlet conduit and the outletconduit.
 8. The nuclear power plant of claim 7 wherein each shutoffmechanism includes a crimping system to crimp the inlet conduit and tocrimp the outlet conduit.
 9. The nuclear power plant of claim 7 whereineach shutoff mechanism includes an inlet conduit shutoff valve arrangedon the inlet conduit and an outlet conduit shutoff valve arranged on theoutlet conduit.
 10. The nuclear power plant of claim 2 wherein thevessel further comprising a neutron reflector positioned therein,between the plurality of heat exchangers and the graphite moderatorcore, the neutron reflector defining at least one aperture fluidlyconnecting the heat exchanger unit and the graphite moderator core. 11.The nuclear power plant of claim 1 wherein at least one heat exchangeris positioned in the vessel, the vessel further comprising a neutronreflector positioned therein, between the at least one heat exchangerand the graphite neutron moderator core, the neutron reflector definingat least one aperture fluidly connecting the heat exchanger unit and thegraphite neutron moderator core.
 12. The nuclear power plant of claim 1wherein the shutoff mechanisms further comprise sever mechanisms tophysically sever each inlet conduit and outlet conduit to allowsequestration of the vessel and any segments of inlet conduits andoutlet conduits attached to the vessel.
 13. A nuclear power plantcomprising: an integral molten salt reactor (IMSR) comprising: a vessel,the vessel comprising: a graphite moderator core, the graphite moderatorcore defining one or more than one through hole; a molten saltcirculating within the vessel and within the one or more than onethrough hole, the molten salt for receiving heat produced by the IMSR;and heat exchangers, each heat exchanger defining a volume; conduitsconnecting the heat exchangers to an outside the vessel and to an enduse system, each conduit comprising a coolant salt circulating within,the coolant salt for receiving heat from the molten salt and providingthe heat to the end use system located at the outside of the vessel, theconduits comprising inlet conduits and outlet conduits, each heatexchanger having connected thereto an inlet conduit and an outletconduit, the inlet conduit to circulate coolant salt away from the heatexchanger to which it is connected, the outlet conduit to circulatecoolant salt toward the heat exchanger to which it is connected;radioactivity detectors, each radioactivity detector having associatedthereto a respective heat exchanger; pressure detectors; and shutoffmechanisms, each inlet conduit having associated thereto a respectiveshutoff mechanism, each outlet conduit having associated thereto arespective shutdown mechanism, each radioactivity detector for detectingradioactivity present in the coolant salt circulating in the heatexchanger associated to the respective radioactivity detector, at leastone of the inlet conduit and the outlet conduit of each heat exchangerhaving a respective pressure detector connected thereto, each pressuredetector for monitoring pressure of the coolant salt in the inletconduit or the outlet conduit to which the pressure detector isconnected, the shutoff mechanisms to shut off circulation of the coolantsalt within the inlet conduit and the outlet conduit of a particularheat exchanger when at least one of: (a) the radioactivity in theparticular heat exchanger exceeds a pre-determined threshold amount, and(b) the pressure in the at least one of the inlet conduit and the outletconduit of the particular heat exchanger changes, wherein in the eventthat the shutoff mechanism shuts down the particular heat exchanger, theremaining heat exchangers still function and the IMSR continues tooperate.
 14. The nuclear power plant of claim 13 further comprising apump system to pump the coolant salt through the one or more than oneheat exchanger.
 15. The nuclear power plant of claim 13 wherein theshutoff mechanism includes a crimping system to crimp the inlet conduitor outlet to which the shutoff mechanism is associated, or a shutoffvalve connected to an inlet conduit or an outlet conduit, the shutoffvalve to shut off circulation of the coolant salt circulating in theinlet conduit or the outlet conduit to which the shutoff valve isconnected.
 16. The nuclear power plant of claim 13, wherein the vesselfurther comprises a neutron reflector positioned between the heatexchangers and the graphite moderator core, the neutron reflectordefining at least one aperture configured to have the molten salt flowtherethrough, between the graphite moderator core and the volume definedby each heat exchanger.
 17. The nuclear power plant of claim 13, whereinthe vessel further comprises a baffle structure positioned between theheat exchangers and the graphite moderator core, the baffle structure toguide the molten salt to flow downwards along an outside periphery ofthe graphite moderator core.
 18. The nuclear power plant of claim 13,wherein the vessel further comprises a control rod.
 19. The nuclearpower plant of claim 13, wherein the number of heat exchangers rangesfrom one to six.